The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of the effect of oral taurine supplementation on fasting levels of fibroblast growth factors, β-Klotho co-receptor, some biochemical indices and body composition in obese women on a weight-loss diet: a study protocol for a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13063-019-3421-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fatemeh Haidari, Maryam Asadi, Javad mohammadi-asl, Kambiz Ahmadi-Angali |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
Researcher | 6 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 30 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 23 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 35 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,566,759
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,031
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,794
of 366,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.