↓ Skip to main content

Overall survival after reirradiation of spinal metastases – independent validation of predictive models

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Overall survival after reirradiation of spinal metastases – independent validation of predictive models
Published in
Radiation Oncology, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13014-016-0613-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Buergy, Lena Siedlitzki, Judit Boda-Heggemann, Frederik Wenz, Frank Lohr

Abstract

It is unknown if survival prediction tools (SPTs) sufficiently predict survival in patients who undergo palliative reirradiation of spinal metastases. We therefore set out to clarify if SPTs can predict survival in this patient population. We retrospectively analyzed spinal reirradiations performed (n = 58, 52 patients, 44 included in analysis). SPTs for patients with spinal metastases were identified and compared to a general palliative score and to a dedicated SPT to estimate prognosis in palliative reirradiation independent of site (SPT-Nieder). Consistently in all tests, SPT-Nieder showed best predictive performance as compared to other tools. Items associated with survival were general condition (KPS), liver metastases, and steroid use. Other factors like primary tumor site, pleural effusion, and bone metastases were not correlated with survival. We adapted an own score to the data which performed comparable to SPT-Nieder but avoids the pleural effusion item. Both scores showed good performance in identifying long-term survivors with late recurrences. Survival prediction in case of spinal reirradiation is possible with sufficient predictive separation. Applying SPTs in case of reirradiation helps to identify patients with good life expectancy who might benefit from dose escalation or longer treatment courses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 57%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,791,786
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,276
of 2,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,955
of 299,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#23
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.