↓ Skip to main content

Virology Journal Reviewer Acknowledgement 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Virology Journal Reviewer Acknowledgement 2015
Published in
Virology Journal, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12985-016-0484-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linfa Wang

Abstract

The editors of Virology Journal would like to thank all our reviewers who have contributed to the journal in Volume 12 (2015). The success of any scientific journal depends on an effective and strict peer review process and Virology Journal could not operate without your contribution.Our record time from submission to online, open access, publication in 2015 was 36 days for a Research Article (Virol J 12:107, 2015). This is a great achievement by any standard. We look forward to your continuous support of Virology Journal either as an invited reviewer or a contributing author in the years to come.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2020.
All research outputs
#10,687,778
of 18,750,173 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#1,125
of 2,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,297
of 273,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,750,173 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them