↓ Skip to main content

EviAtlas: a tool for visualising evidence synthesis databases

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 301)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
149 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EviAtlas: a tool for visualising evidence synthesis databases
Published in
Environmental Evidence, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13750-019-0167-1
Authors

Neal R. Haddaway, Andrew Feierman, Matthew J. Grainger, Charles T. Gray, Ezgi Tanriver-Ayder, Sanita Dhaubanjar, Martin J. Westgate

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 17%
Environmental Science 13 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Engineering 6 6%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 23 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2022.
All research outputs
#371,079
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#4
of 301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,763
of 352,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.