↓ Skip to main content

Reliability and validity of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) in patients with hip osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability and validity of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) in patients with hip osteoarthritis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ida Svege, Elin Kolle, May Arna Risberg

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) is beneficial in reducing pain and improving function in lower limb osteoarthritis (OA), and is recommended as a first line treatment. Self-administered questionnaires are used to assess PA, but knowledge about reliability and validity of these PA questionnaires are limited, in particular for patients with OA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) in patients with hip OA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 184 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 53 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 15%
Sports and Recreations 21 11%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 60 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,272
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,441
of 4,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,309
of 156,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#26
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.