↓ Skip to main content

Identification of novel surfactin derivatives from NRPS modification of Bacillus subtilis and its antifungal activity againstFusarium moniliforme

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of novel surfactin derivatives from NRPS modification of Bacillus subtilis and its antifungal activity againstFusarium moniliforme
Published in
BMC Microbiology, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12866-016-0645-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Jiang, Ling Gao, Xiaomei Bie, Zhaoxin Lu, Hongxia Liu, Chong Zhang, Fengxia Lu, Haizhen Zhao

Abstract

Bacillus subtilis strain PB2-L1 produces the lipopeptide surfactin, a highly potent biosurfactant synthesized by a large multimodular nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS). In the present study, the modules SrfA-A-Leu, SrfA-B-Asp, and SrfA-B-Leu from surfactin NRPS in B. subtilis BP2-L1 were successfully knocked-out using a temperature-sensitive plasmid, pKS2-mediated-based, homologous, recombination method. Three novel surfactin products were produced, individually lacking amino acid Leu-3, Asp-5, or Leu-6. These surfactins were detected, isolated, and characterized by HPLC and LC-FTICR-MS/MS. In comparison with native surfactin, [∆Leu(3)]surfactin and [∆Leu(6)]surfactin showed evidence of reduced toxicity, while [∆Asp(5)]surfactin showed stronger inhibition than native surfactin against B. pumilus and Micrococcus luteus. These results showed that the minimum inhibitory concentration of [∆Leu(6)]surfactin for Fusarium moniliforme was 50 μg/mL, such that [∆Leu(6)]surfactin could lead to mycelium projection, cell damage, and leakage of nucleic acids and protein. These factors all contributed to stimulating apoptosis in F. moniliforme. The present results revealed that [∆Leu(6)]surfactin showed a significant antifungal activity against F. moniliforme and might successfully be employed to control fungal food contamination and improve food safety.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 111 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 22%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 32 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 36 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,791,786
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#2,010
of 3,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,519
of 300,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#41
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.