↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Comparison of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing library preparation strategies identifies sources of biases affecting DNA methylation data

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Comparison of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing library preparation strategies identifies sources of biases affecting DNA methylation data
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13059-019-1656-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nelly Olova, Felix Krueger, Simon Andrews, David Oxley, Rebecca V. Berrens, Miguel R. Branco, Wolf Reik

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Unspecified 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 67%
Unspecified 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,683,244
of 14,395,965 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#2,849
of 3,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,003
of 260,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,395,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them