Title |
Diagnostic methods to determine microbiology of postpartum endometritis in South Asia: laboratory methods protocol used in the Postpartum Sepsis Study: a prospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Reproductive Health, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12978-016-0121-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sadia Shakoor, Megan E. Reller, Amnesty LeFevre, Aneeta Hotwani, Shahida M. Qureshi, Farheen Yousuf, Mohammad Shahidul Islam, Nicholas Connor, Iftekhar Rafiqullah, Fatima Mir, Shabina Arif, Sajid Soofi, Linda A. Bartlett, Samir Saha, the ANISA-Postpartum Sepsis Study Group |
Abstract |
The South Asian region has the second highest risk of maternal death in the world. To prevent maternal deaths due to sepsis and to decrease the maternal mortality ratio as per the World Health Organization Millenium Development Goals, a better understanding of the etiology of endometritis and related sepsis is required. We describe microbiological laboratory methods used in the maternal Postpartum Sepsis Study, which was conducted in Bangladesh and Pakistan, two populous countries in South Asia. Postpartum maternal fever in the community was evaluated by a physician and blood and urine were collected for routine analysis and culture. If endometritis was suspected, an endometrial brush sample was collected in the hospital for aerobic and anaerobic culture and molecular detection of bacterial etiologic agents (previously identified and/or plausible). The results emanating from this study will provide microbiologic evidence of the etiology and susceptibility pattern of agents recovered from patients with postpartum fever in South Asia, data critical for the development of evidence-based algorithms for management of postpartum fever in the region. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Bangladesh | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Researcher | 5 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 24% |
Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 41% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 27 | 31% |