↓ Skip to main content

Annual acknowledgement of manuscript reviewers

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Annual acknowledgement of manuscript reviewers
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12962-016-0054-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan Rovira

Abstract

The editors of Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation would like to thank all our reviewers who have contributed to the journal in volume 13 (2015).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,447,592
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#353
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,049
of 299,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.