↓ Skip to main content

Molecular markers to characterize the hermaphroditic reproductive system of the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Developmental Biology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 366)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular markers to characterize the hermaphroditic reproductive system of the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea
Published in
BMC Developmental Biology, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-213x-11-69
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracy Chong, Joel M Stary, Yuying Wang, Phillip A Newmark

Abstract

The freshwater planarian Schmidtea mediterranea exhibits two distinct reproductive modes. Individuals of the sexual strain are cross-fertilizing hermaphrodites with reproductive organs that develop post-embryonically. By contrast, individuals of the asexual strain reproduce exclusively by transverse fission and fail to develop reproductive organs. These different reproductive strains are associated with distinct karyotypes, making S. mediterranea a useful model for studying germline development and sexual differentiation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 94 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 26%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 27%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,197,013
of 23,947,581 outputs
Outputs from BMC Developmental Biology
#19
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,477
of 145,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Developmental Biology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,947,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.