↓ Skip to main content

Health technology assessment review: Remote monitoring of vital signs - current status and future challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health technology assessment review: Remote monitoring of vital signs - current status and future challenges
Published in
Critical Care, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/cc9208
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vishal Nangalia, David R Prytherch, Gary B Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 258 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 16%
Researcher 40 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Other 17 6%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 49 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 23%
Engineering 46 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 11%
Computer Science 29 11%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 56 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,794
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,612
of 106,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#17
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.