↓ Skip to main content

The moral concerns of biobank donors: the effect of non-welfare interests on willingness to donate

Overview of attention for article published in Life Sciences, Society and Policy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 132)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The moral concerns of biobank donors: the effect of non-welfare interests on willingness to donate
Published in
Life Sciences, Society and Policy, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40504-016-0036-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond G. De Vries, Tom Tomlinson, H. Myra Kim, Chris D. Krenz, Kerry A. Ryan, Nicole Lehpamer, Scott Y. H. Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Philosophy 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#424,596
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Life Sciences, Society and Policy
#5
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,523
of 318,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Life Sciences, Society and Policy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them