You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
History of burns: The past, present and the future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Burns & Trauma, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.4103/2321-3868.143620 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kwang Chear Lee, Kavita Joory, Naiem S. Moiemen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 240 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 17% |
| Unknown | 86 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 5% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 93 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,173,660
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Burns & Trauma
#13
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,030
of 273,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Burns & Trauma
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them