↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of population estimation techniques for individually unidentifiable free-roaming dogs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of population estimation techniques for individually unidentifiable free-roaming dogs
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12917-019-1938-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. V. Meunier, A. D. Gibson, J. Corfmat, S. Mazeri, I. G. Handel, L. Gamble, B Mde C Bronsvoort, R. J. Mellanby

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 7 8%
Professor 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 24 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,275,986
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#308
of 3,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,246
of 354,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#15
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.