↓ Skip to main content

Diving accidents: a cohort study from the Netherlands

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Emergency Medicine, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diving accidents: a cohort study from the Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12245-016-0109-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. W. Smithuis, E. Gips, T. P. van Rees Vellinga, M. I. Gaakeer

Abstract

Diving is, besides professional reasons, an increasingly popular leisure activity. Whilst statistically compared to other sports safe, diving accidents can result in serious complications. In order to treat this specific patient category adequately, early diagnosis is important. In this study, we explore various medical aspects of diving accidents. By sharing our experiences, we intend to create awareness and enhance urgent medical care for this specific category of patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using anonymized patient records from the emergency department (ED) of the Admiraal De Ruyter Hospital (ADRZ) and affiliated Medical Centre Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (MCHZ1) both in Goes, Netherlands. We evaluated all patients that presented to our ED as a diving accident from 1 November 2011 to 30 August 2015. In the selected period, 43 patients presented to our ED with complaints after diving; 84 % were male and 49 % older than 40 years, and they came by ambulance or referred by a general practitioner or other medical centres in the area; 70 % presented the same date as their dive, 21 % 1 to 3 days and 9 % later than 3 days after having dived. Pain was the most frequently reported symptom (44 %), followed by constitutional symptoms (42 %). Numbness or paraesthesia was reported in 33 %. Respiratory symptoms, dizziness, a change in mental status (e.g. apathy, confused or restlessness) and problems with coordination were present in 10-21 % of the cases. Symptoms that were apparent in less than 10 % of the cases were cutis marmorata, visual or auditory complaints, muscle weakness, cardiovascular symptoms or a malfunction of the anal sphincter or urinary bladder. Most of our patients exhibited more than one symptom; 70 % of all patients received hyperbaric oxygen recompression therapy. The limited number of patients presenting with complaints after a diving incident, the difficulty of recognition and the (potential) huge impact if not recognized and treated adequately make us believe that every diving accident should be discussed with a centre of expertise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Other 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 43%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2016.
All research outputs
#13,769,531
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#357
of 602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,296
of 300,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.