You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health economic evaluation of a web-based intervention for depression: the EVIDENT-trial, a randomized controlled study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Economics Review, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13561-019-0233-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Viola Gräfe, Thomas Berger, Martin Hautzinger, Fritz Hohagen, Wolfgang Lutz, Björn Meyer, Steffen Moritz, Matthias Rose, Johanna Schröder, Christina Späth, Jan Philipp Klein, Wolfgang Greiner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 54 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,080,459
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#127
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,380
of 354,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.