The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why, when and how to update a meta-ethnography qualitative synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-016-0218-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma F. France, Mary Wells, Heidi Lang, Brian Williams |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 20% |
| Guinea | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 70% |
| Scientists | 9 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 25% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Psychology | 15 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,708,708
of 23,929,753 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#275
of 2,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,879
of 302,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,929,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.