You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy of commercially available biological agents for the topical treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1050-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alex Baleka Mutombo, Cindy Simoens, Rahma Tozin, Johannes Bogers, Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden, Yves Jacquemyn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 30 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 31% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 33 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,047,580
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,567
of 2,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,275
of 353,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#46
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.