↓ Skip to main content

Aetiology and outcomes of sepsis in adults in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aetiology and outcomes of sepsis in adults in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Critical Care, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2501-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph M. Lewis, Nicholas A. Feasey, Jamie Rylance

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 14%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Other 10 8%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 35%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Unspecified 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 36 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,442,286
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,301
of 6,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,876
of 353,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#47
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.