You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
XMPP for cloud computing in bioinformatics supporting discovery and invocation of asynchronous web services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-10-279 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johannes Wagener, Ola Spjuth, Egon L Willighagen, Jarl ES Wikberg |
| Abstract |
Life sciences make heavily use of the web for both data provision and analysis. However, the increasing amount of available data and the diversity of analysis tools call for machine accessible interfaces in order to be effective. HTTP-based Web service technologies, like the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) and REpresentational State Transfer (REST) services, are today the most common technologies for this in bioinformatics. However, these methods have severe drawbacks, including lack of discoverability, and the inability for services to send status notifications. Several complementary workarounds have been proposed, but the results are ad-hoc solutions of varying quality that can be difficult to use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 73 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 35 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 34% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,791,097
of 25,079,131 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#337
of 7,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,299
of 98,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#2
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.