You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Molecular evolution of genes in avian genomes
Genome Biology, January 2010
Kiwoong Nam, Carina Mugal, Benoit Nabholz, Holger Schielzeth, Jochen BW Wolf, Niclas Backström, Axel Künstner, Christopher N Balakrishnan, Andreas Heger, Chris P Ponting, David F Clayton, Hans Ellegren
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||63||28%|
|Student > Master||29||13%|
|Student > Bachelor||15||7%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||15||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||136||61%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||33||15%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
of 4,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 169,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.