You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A community-based participatory research methodology to address, redress, and reassess disparities in respiratory health among First Nations
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13104-015-1137-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Punam Pahwa, Sylvia Abonyi, Chandima Karunanayake, Donna C Rennie, Bonnie Janzen, Shelley Kirychuk, Joshua A Lawson, Tarun Katapally, Kathleen McMullin, Jeremy Seeseequasis, Arnold Naytowhow, Louise Hagel, Roland F Dyck, Mark Fenton, Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan, Vivian Ramsden, Malcolm King, Niels Koehncke, Greg Marchildon, Lesley McBain, Thomas Smith-Windsor, Janet Smylie, Jo-Ann Episkenew, James A Dosman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 19% |
Researcher | 16 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Librarian | 7 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 36 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,575,425
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,334
of 4,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,659
of 266,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#48
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.