↓ Skip to main content

The impairment of small nerve fibers in severe sepsis and septic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impairment of small nerve fibers in severe sepsis and septic shock
Published in
Critical Care, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1241-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hubertus Axer, Alexander Grimm, Christine Pausch, Ulrike Teschner, Jan Zinke, Sven Eisenach, Sindy Beck, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius, Frank M. Brunkhorst, Otto W. Witte

Abstract

A decrease of small nerve fibers in skin biopsies during the course of critical illness has been demonstrated recently. However, the diagnostic use of skin biopsies in sepsis and its time course is not known. Patients (n=32) with severe sepsis or septic shock were examined using skin biopsies, neurological examination, nerve conduction studies, and sympathetic skin response in the first week after onset of sepsis, 2 weeks and 4 months later and compared to gender- and age-matched healthy controls. Skin biopsies at the ankle and thigh revealed a significant decrease of intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) during the first week of sepsis and 2 weeks later. All patients developed critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) according to electrophysiological criteria and 11 showed IENFD values lower than the 0.05 quantile. Four patients were biopsied after 4 months and still showed decreased IENFD. Results of nerve conduction studies and IENFD did considerably change over time. No differences for survival time between patients with IEFND lower and larger than 3.5 fibers/mm were found. Skin biopsy is able to detect an impairment of small sensory nerve fibers early in the course of sepsis. However, it may not be suited as a prognostic parameter for survival. German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID: DRKS00000642 , 12/17/2010.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Other 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 21 28%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,565,533
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,377
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,761
of 314,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#40
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.