You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reanalysis of the NCCN PD-L1 companion diagnostic assay study for lung cancer in the context of PD-L1 expression findings in triple-negative breast cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13058-019-1156-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David L. Rimm, Gang Han, Janis M. Taube, Eunhee S. Yi, Julia A. Bridge, Douglas B. Flieder, Robert Homer, Anja C. Roden, Fred R. Hirsch, Ignacio I. Wistuba, Lajos Pusztai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
Singapore | 1 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 18% |
Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 48% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,051,839
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#806
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,408
of 368,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.