↓ Skip to main content

Towards Web-based representation and processing of health information

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards Web-based representation and processing of health information
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-8-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheng Gao, Darka Mioc, Xiaolun Yi, Francois Anton, Eddie Oldfield, David J Coleman

Abstract

There is great concern within health surveillance, on how to grapple with environmental degradation, rapid urbanization, population mobility and growth. The Internet has emerged as an efficient way to share health information, enabling users to access and understand data at their fingertips. Increasingly complex problems in the health field require increasingly sophisticated computer software, distributed computing power, and standardized data sharing. To address this need, Web-based mapping is now emerging as an important tool to enable health practitioners, policy makers, and the public to understand spatial health risks, population health trends and vulnerabilities. Today several web-based health applications generate dynamic maps; however, for people to fully interpret the maps they need data source description and the method used in the data analysis or statistical modeling. For the representation of health information through Web-mapping applications, there still lacks a standard format to accommodate all fixed (such as location) and variable (such as age, gender, health outcome, etc) indicators in the representation of health information. Furthermore, net-centric computing has not been adequately applied to support flexible health data processing and mapping online.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 5 5%
United States 4 4%
India 3 3%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 88 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 21%
Social Sciences 16 15%
Computer Science 15 14%
Engineering 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 18 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#463
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,966
of 184,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.