You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of MetaMap and cTAKES for entity extraction in clinical notes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-018-0654-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth Reátegui, Sylvie Ratté |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 27% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 28 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,389,010
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,115
of 2,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,977
of 337,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.