You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improving HIV service delivery for people who inject drugs in Kazakhstan: study protocol for the Bridge stepped-wedge trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0909-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tara McCrimmon, Louisa Gilbert, Timothy Hunt, Assel Terlikbayeva, Elwin Wu, Meruyert Darisheva, Sholpan Primbetova, Azamat Kuskulov, Alissa Davis, Anindita Dasgupta, Bruce R. Schackman, Lisa R. Metsch, Daniel J. Feaster, Baurzhan Baiserkin, Nabila El-Bassel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 47% |
Kazakhstan | 2 | 11% |
Rwanda | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 31 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 32 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,081,878
of 24,619,747 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#645
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,435
of 358,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#23
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,619,747 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.