Title |
A survey of the availability, prices and affordability of essential medicines in Jiangsu Province, China
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12913-015-1008-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaoyu Xi, Weixia Li, Jun Li, Xuan Zhu, Cong Fu, Xu Wei, Shuzhen Chu |
Abstract |
Field surveys conducted in China before the implementation of the essential medicine policy showed that Chinese individuals faced less access to essential medicines. This paper aims to evaluate the availability, prices and affordability of essential medicines in Jiangsu Province, China after the implementation of the policy in 2009. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Jiangsu in 2013 using the World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) methodology. Data on the availability and prices of 50 essential medicines were collected from the public and private healthcare sectors. The mean availabilities of innovator brands and lowest priced generics (LPGs) were 11.5 % and 100 % in primary healthcare facilities, 36.8 % and 32.6 % in the secondary and tertiary sectors, and 18.7 % and 42.9 % in the private sector, respectively. The median price ratios (MPRs) were 1.26 to 2.05 for generics and 3.76 to 27.22 for innovator brands. Treating ten common diseases with LPGs was generally affordable, whereas treatment with IBs was less affordable. The high availability of LPGs at primary healthcare facilities reflects the success of the essential medicine policy, while the low availability in secondary and tertiary levels and in private pharmacies reflects a failure to implement the policy in these levels. The health policy should be fully developed and enforced at the secondary and tertiary levels and in the private sector to ensure equitable access to health services. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 25% |
Researcher | 10 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 18 | 27% |