↓ Skip to main content

A survey of the availability, prices and affordability of essential medicines in Jiangsu Province, China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A survey of the availability, prices and affordability of essential medicines in Jiangsu Province, China
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12913-015-1008-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoyu Xi, Weixia Li, Jun Li, Xuan Zhu, Cong Fu, Xu Wei, Shuzhen Chu

Abstract

Field surveys conducted in China before the implementation of the essential medicine policy showed that Chinese individuals faced less access to essential medicines. This paper aims to evaluate the availability, prices and affordability of essential medicines in Jiangsu Province, China after the implementation of the policy in 2009. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Jiangsu in 2013 using the World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) methodology. Data on the availability and prices of 50 essential medicines were collected from the public and private healthcare sectors. The mean availabilities of innovator brands and lowest priced generics (LPGs) were 11.5 % and 100 % in primary healthcare facilities, 36.8 % and 32.6 % in the secondary and tertiary sectors, and 18.7 % and 42.9 % in the private sector, respectively. The median price ratios (MPRs) were 1.26 to 2.05 for generics and 3.76 to 27.22 for innovator brands. Treating ten common diseases with LPGs was generally affordable, whereas treatment with IBs was less affordable. The high availability of LPGs at primary healthcare facilities reflects the success of the essential medicine policy, while the low availability in secondary and tertiary levels and in private pharmacies reflects a failure to implement the policy in these levels. The health policy should be fully developed and enforced at the secondary and tertiary levels and in the private sector to ensure equitable access to health services.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 25%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 18 27%