↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of the usage and effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment and insecticide-treated nets on the indicators of malaria among pregnant women attending antenatal care in the Buea…

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of the usage and effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment and insecticide-treated nets on the indicators of malaria among pregnant women attending antenatal care in the Buea Health District, Cameroon
Published in
Malaria Journal, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12936-016-1228-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Bertrand Fokam, Leonard Ngimuh, Judith K. Anchang-Kimbi, Samuel Wanji

Abstract

Malaria in pregnancy is an immense public health problem with at least 50 million pregnant women living in malaria endemic areas. To prevent malaria and its complications in pregnancy the World Health Organization recommends the use of intermittent preventive treatment sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP), the use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), and effective case management. In most malaria endemic countries in Africa, 40 % of pregnant women sleep under ITNs. In Cameroon, about 90 % of pregnant women receive the first dose of SP, while 64 % take the complete dose. Following the 2011 mass-campaign of free distribution of ITNs coupled with routine ANC distribution of ITN and adoption of IPTp in Cameroon, little has been done to assess the effectiveness of both interventions outside of Yaoundé, the capital city. This study sought to assess the usage and effectiveness of IPTp-SP and ITNs on malaria in pregnancy. The research was a cross-sectional hospital-based study that included 410 pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in the Buea Health District. Capillary blood samples were collected to check malaria parasite by microscopy and haemoglobin levels by microhaematocrit technique. A prevalence of 13.4 and 41.7 % was detected for malaria and anaemia, respectively. The Overall coverage of ITN was 32.4 % while that of ITPp was 63.2 %. Malaria prevalence was least (7.2 %) amongst women using both IPTp-SP and ITN while those with no intervention had the highest malaria prevalence of 18.6 % (χ2 = 6.188; P = 0.103). Of the women with malaria, 12.73 % were using ITN and had taken at least one dose of SP, 38.18 % had taken at least one dose IPTp only, 10.91 % were using only ITN and 38.18 % were not using any preventive measure. There was a difference in anaemia status within the different intervention groups (χ2 = 8.673; P = 0.034). Pregnant women using both interventions were less associated to malaria (OR = 0.341, 95 % CI = 0.138-0.841) compared to those using only one control method. Repeated doses of SP in combination with ITN use are effective in reducing malaria parasitaemia and improving haemoglobin level of pregnant women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 185 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 26%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 49 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 19%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 56 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,843,902
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,263
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,554
of 332,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#64
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.