↓ Skip to main content

Timing for intracoronary administration of bone marrow mononuclear cells after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Timing for intracoronary administration of bone marrow mononuclear cells after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a pilot study
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13287-015-0102-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rongchong Huang, Kang Yao, Aijun Sun, Juying Qian, Lei Ge, Yiqi Zhang, Yuhong Niu, Keqiang Wang, Yunzeng Zou, Junbo Ge

Abstract

Most studies on intracoronary bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMC) transplantation for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) involve treatment 3-7 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, the optimal timing is unknown. The present study assessed the therapeutic effect at different times after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The present trial was not blinded. A total of 104 patients with a first STEMI and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 50%, who had PCI of the infarct-related artery, were randomly assigned to receive intracoronary infusion of BMC within 24 hours (Group A, n = 27), 3 to 7 days after PCI (Group B, n = 26), or 7 to 30 days after PCI (Group C, n = 26), or to the control group (CON, n = 25), which received saline infusion performed immediately after emergency PCI. All patients in Group A, B and C received an injection of 15 ml of cell suspension containing approximately 4.9 × 10(8) BMC into the infarct-related artery after successful PCI. Compared to CON and group C patients, Group A and B patients had a significantly higher absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline to 12 months (the change of LVEF: 3.4% ± 5.7% in CON, 7.9% ± 4.9% in Group A, 6.9% ± 3.9% in Group B, 4.7% ± 3.7% in Group C), a greater decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volumes (LVESV) (the change of LVESV: -6.4 ± 15.9ml in CON, -20.5 ± 13.3ml in Group A, -19.6 ± 11.1ml in Group B, -9.4 ± 16.3ml in Group C), and significantly greater myocardial perfusion (change from baseline: -4.7 ± 5.7% in CON, -7.8 ± 4.5% in Group A, -7.5 ± 2.9% in Group B, -5.0 ± 4.0% in Group C). Group A and B patients had similar beneficial effects on cardiac function (p = 0.163) and LV geometry (LVEDV: p = 0.685; LVESV: p = 0.622) assessed by echocardiography, whereas Group C showed similar results to those of the CON group. Group B showed more expensive care (p < 0.001) and longer hospital stays during the first month after emergency PCI (p < 0.001) than Group A, with a similar improvement after repeat cardiac catheterization following emergency PCI. Cell therapy in AMI patients that is given within 24 hours is similar to 3-7 days after the primary PCI. (TRN: NCT02425358 , 30 April 2015).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,447,592
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#1,732
of 2,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,066
of 265,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#39
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.