You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Occupational therapy for epidermolysis bullosa: clinical practice guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-019-1059-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer M. Chan, Amy Weisman, Alex King, Susan Maksomski, Carrissa Shotwell, Claire Bailie, Helen Weaver, Rebecca Bodan, Estrella Guerrero, Matija Zmazek, Phuong Khuu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,629,457
of 23,952,301 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,116
of 2,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,490
of 356,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#30
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,952,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.