↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of weight bearing functional exercise and non-weight bearing quadriceps strengthening exercise on pain and function for people with knee osteoarthritis and obesity: protocol for the TARGET…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of weight bearing functional exercise and non-weight bearing quadriceps strengthening exercise on pain and function for people with knee osteoarthritis and obesity: protocol for the TARGET randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12891-019-2662-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim L. Bennell, Rachel K. Nelligan, Alexander J. Kimp, Tim V. Wrigley, Ben Metcalf, Jessica Kasza, Paul W. Hodges, Rana S. Hinman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Master 18 9%
Other 14 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 104 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 34 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 14%
Sports and Recreations 11 5%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 111 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#12,883,975
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,725
of 4,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,132
of 351,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#48
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.