↓ Skip to main content

Establishing an Anaesthesia and Intensive Care partnership and aiming for national impact in Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Establishing an Anaesthesia and Intensive Care partnership and aiming for national impact in Tanzania
Published in
Globalization and Health, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12992-016-0144-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mpoki Ulisubisya, Henrik Jörnvall, Lars Irestedt, Tim Baker

Abstract

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is a neglected specialty in low-income countries. There is an acute shortage of health workers - several low-income countries have less than 1 anaesthesia provider per 100,000 population. Only 1.5 % of hospitals in Africa have the intensive care resources needed for managing patients with sepsis. Health partnerships between institutions in high and low-income countries have been proposed as an effective way to strengthen health systems. The aim of this article is to describe the origin and conduct of a health partnership in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care between institutions in Tanzania and Sweden and how the partnership has expanded to have an impact at regional and national levels.The Muhimbili-Karolinska Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Collaboration was initiated in 2008 on the request of the Executive Director of Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam. The partnership has conducted training courses, exchanges, research projects and introduced new equipment, routines and guidelines. The partnership has expanded to include all hospitals in Dar es Salaam. Through the newly formed Life Support Foundation, the partnership has had a national impact assisting the reanimation of the Society of Anaesthesiologists of Tanzania and has seen a marked increase of the number of young doctors choosing a residency in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Researcher 11 13%
Other 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2016.
All research outputs
#19,527,296
of 24,021,239 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#1,066
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,304
of 305,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,021,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.