You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with sarcoidosis with and without cardiac involvement by magnetic resonance feature tracking at 1.5T: a follow up study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-18-s1-o102 |
| Authors |
Darius Dabir, David Meyer, Rami Homsi, Julian A Luetkens, Christian Marx, Folke Kluenker, Daniel Kuetting, Hans H Schild, Daniel K Thomas |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2016.
All research outputs
#23,069,091
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,293
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#349,386
of 407,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#41
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.