You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How different online recruitment methods impact on recruitment rates for the web-based coortesnaweb project: a randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0767-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cauane Blumenberg, Ana Maria Baptista Menezes, Helen Gonçalves, Maria Cecília Formoso Assunção, Fernando César Wehrmeister, Aluísio J. D. Barros |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Brazil | 1 | 17% |
| Ireland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
| Psychology | 7 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,810,049
of 25,204,906 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,153
of 2,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,650
of 358,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#30
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,204,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.