↓ Skip to main content

Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
168 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking
Published in
Genome Biology, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13059-019-1738-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lukas M. Weber, Wouter Saelens, Robrecht Cannoodt, Charlotte Soneson, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Paul P. Gardner, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Yvan Saeys, Mark D. Robinson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 168 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 288 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 24%
Researcher 47 16%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Other 16 6%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 62 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 20%
Computer Science 30 10%
Engineering 11 4%
Mathematics 8 3%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 67 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#399,141
of 25,630,321 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#204
of 4,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,258
of 367,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#12
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,630,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.