You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1347-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ketevan Glonti, Daniel Cauchi, Erik Cobo, Isabelle Boutron, David Moher, Darko Hren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 9 | 11% |
Canada | 7 | 9% |
Spain | 6 | 7% |
United States | 5 | 6% |
Switzerland | 5 | 6% |
France | 3 | 4% |
Ireland | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 34 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 41 | 51% |
Scientists | 26 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
Researcher | 6 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Other | 14 | 21% |
Unknown | 20 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 24 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#693,177
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#488
of 4,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,801
of 368,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#13
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.