You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lipid–peptide bioconjugation through pyridyl disulfide reaction chemistry and its application in cell targeting and drug delivery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-019-0509-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diego de la Fuente-Herreruela, Ajay K. Monnappa, Mónica Muñoz-Úbeda, Aarón Morallón-Piña, Eduardo Enciso, Luis Sánchez, Fabrice Giusti, Paolo Natale, Iván López-Montero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| South Africa | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 11 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,575,425
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#673
of 1,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,085
of 352,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,460 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.