Comprehensive assessment of multiple biases in small RNA sequencing reveals significant differences in the performance of widely used methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, June 2019

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 114 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 20 X posts from 15 X users, with an upper bound of 46,504 followers.

@davemc528 quantifying small RNAs with sequencing requires different sample preparations since theres usually a size-selection step in standard RNA-seq libraries which exclude miRNAs - see more work here: https://t.co/krGsmsx3jz

27 Jan 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

The simplicity of RNA-seq analysis as illustrated by the @markrobinsonca et al lab 10.1534/g3.119.400185 Other recent RNA-seq predictable "revelations" https://t.co/QPDBlA51EE https://t.co/jl3SwJvDtu https://t.co/7HviclweME

06 Sep 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @mirnas22: Interested in #smallRNA? Check out @LieberInstitute's new publication @BMC_series #BMCGenomics! 🎉 We found major differences…

03 Jul 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @mirnas22: Interested in #smallRNA? Check out @LieberInstitute's new publication @BMC_series #BMCGenomics! 🎉 We found major differences…

03 Jul 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 16 additional X posts.