↓ Skip to main content

Identifying educator behaviours for high quality verbal feedback in health professions education: literature review and expert refinement

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying educator behaviours for high quality verbal feedback in health professions education: literature review and expert refinement
Published in
BMC Medical Education, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12909-016-0613-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina E. Johnson, Jennifer L. Keating, David J. Boud, Megan Dalton, Debra Kiegaldie, Margaret Hay, Barry McGrath, Wendy A. McKenzie, Kichu Balakrishnan R. Nair, Debra Nestel, Claire Palermo, Elizabeth K. Molloy

Abstract

Health professions education is characterised by work-based learning and relies on effective verbal feedback. However the literature reports problems in feedback practice, including lack of both learner engagement and explicit strategies for improving performance. It is not clear what constitutes high quality, learner-centred feedback or how educators can promote it. We hoped to enhance feedback in clinical practice by distinguishing the elements of an educator's role in feedback considered to influence learner outcomes, then develop descriptions of observable educator behaviours that exemplify them. An extensive literature review was conducted to identify i) information substantiating specific components of an educator's role in feedback asserted to have an important influence on learner outcomes and ii) verbal feedback instruments in health professions education, that may describe important educator activities in effective feedback. This information was used to construct a list of elements thought to be important in effective feedback. Based on these elements, descriptions of observable educator behaviours that represent effective feedback were developed and refined during three rounds of a Delphi process and a face-to-face meeting with experts across the health professions and education. The review identified more than 170 relevant articles (involving health professions, education, psychology and business literature) and ten verbal feedback instruments in health professions education (plus modified versions). Eighteen distinct elements of an educator's role in effective feedback were delineated. Twenty five descriptions of educator behaviours that align with the elements were ratified by the expert panel. This research clarifies the distinct elements of an educator's role in feedback considered to enhance learner outcomes. The corresponding set of observable educator behaviours aim to describe how an educator could engage, motivate and enable a learner to improve. This creates the foundation for developing a method to systematically evaluate the impact of verbal feedback on learner performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 284 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 17%
Other 28 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Researcher 22 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 7%
Other 76 27%
Unknown 66 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 12%
Social Sciences 20 7%
Psychology 14 5%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 75 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,538,966
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#170
of 4,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,289
of 315,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#6
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.