You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding malaria control among the slash and burn cultivators in Rangamati Hill tracts of Bangladesh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-019-2849-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Avijit Saha, Malabika Sarker, Moktadir Kabir, Guangyu Lu, Olaf Müller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 52 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#13,978,042
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,150
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,220
of 355,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#54
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.