↓ Skip to main content

Short‐term risk of anaemia following initiation of combination antiretroviral treatment in HIV‐infected patients in countries in sub‐Saharan Africa, Asia‐Pacific, and central and South America

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International AIDS Society, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short‐term risk of anaemia following initiation of combination antiretroviral treatment in HIV‐infected patients in countries in sub‐Saharan Africa, Asia‐Pacific, and central and South America
Published in
Journal of the International AIDS Society, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1758-2652-15-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jialun Zhou, Antoine Jaquet, Emmanuel Bissagnene, Beverly Musick, Kara Wools‐Kaloustian, Nicola Maxwell, Andrew Boulle, Firas Wehbe, Daniel Masys, Jeniffer Iriondo‐Perez, Jay Hemingway‐Foday, Matthew Law, eastern Africa the western Africa

Abstract

The objective was to examine the short-term risk and predictors of anaemia following initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in HIV-infected patients from the Western Africa, Eastern Africa, Southern Africa, Central Africa, Asian-Pacific, and Caribbean and Central and South America regions of the International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) collaboration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 1%
Zimbabwe 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 26 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 27 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2012.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International AIDS Society
#1,926
of 2,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,142
of 253,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International AIDS Society
#19
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.