You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health economic evaluation in orthotics and prosthetics: a systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1066-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leigh Clarke, Michael Dillon, Alan Shiell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,541,103
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,208
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,714
of 351,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#28
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.