You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
The effect of breed and diet type on the global transcriptome of hepatic tissue in beef cattle divergent for feed efficiency
BMC Genomics, June 2019
Marc G. Higgins, David A. Kenny, Claire Fitzsimons, Gordon Blackshields, Séan Coyle, Clare McKenna, Mark McGee, Derek W. Morris, Sinéad M. Waters
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||6||17%|
|Student > Master||4||11%|
|Student > Bachelor||3||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||13||37%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||3||9%|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||2||6%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
of 10,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 351,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.