↓ Skip to main content

Development of a nurse home visitation intervention for intimate partner violence

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a nurse home visitation intervention for intimate partner violence
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan M Jack, Marilyn Ford-Gilboe, C Nadine Wathen, Danielle M Davidov, Diane B McNaughton, Jeffrey H Coben, David L Olds, Harriet L MacMillan, NFP IPV Research Team

Abstract

Despite an increase in knowledge about the epidemiology of intimate partner violence (IPV), much less is known about interventions to reduce IPV and its associated impairment. One program that holds promise in preventing IPV and improving outcomes for women exposed to violence is the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP), an evidence-based nurse home visitation program for socially disadvantaged first-time mothers. The present study developed an intervention model and modification process to address IPV within the context of the NFP. This included determining the extent to which the NFP curriculum addressed the needs of women at risk for IPV or its recurrence, along with client, nurse and broader stakeholder perspectives on how best to help NFP clients cope with abusive relationships.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 181 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 45 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 19%
Psychology 27 15%
Social Sciences 23 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 51 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2012.
All research outputs
#6,523,566
of 24,081,774 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,057
of 8,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,360
of 158,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#20
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,081,774 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.