You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness and acceptability of methods of communicating the results of clinical research to lay and professional audiences: protocol for a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1065-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annabelle South, Julia Bailey, Mahesh K. B. Parmar, Claire L. Vale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Librarian | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 26% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,717,501
of 23,507,888 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#683
of 2,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,640
of 352,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#19
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,507,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.