@NomadicQuantum @Neil21283050 @NeuroSGS When Sanchis-Segura et al tested 12 sex-predicting machine-learning algorithms with data adjusted for head size variation, classification accuracy dropped to 10% above chance: https://t.co/oP8r30fDYC There's a great
@bio_logical @NeuroSGS When Sanchis-Segura et al tested 12 sex-predicting machine-learning algorithms with data adjusted for head size variation, classification accuracy dropped to 10% above chance,at ~60% accuracy: https://t.co/oP8r30fDYC More importantly
@Powerful_Memes @GMeteoryan @CJFerguson1111 @voxdotcom So can I - https://t.co/tWGfg5n3J0 The point is, the differences are small. And we still aren't even addressing the environmental impact on brain development. How we are socialised affects our brain.
@Kiwinewell @3reeced @Cambellxo I too would like links or proof of your second claim. Here are ones that refute that claim. https://t.co/aLj9XhaHlH https://t.co/5862mTbfgl This one is more focused on physical differences, while less important, it is still