You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and evaluation of a risk assessment tool to improve clinical triage accuracy for colonoscopic investigations
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12885-018-4140-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anton R. Lord, Lisa A. Simms, Allison Brown, Katherine Hanigan, Krupa Krishnaprasad, Belinda Schouten, Anthony R. Croft, Mark N. Appleyard, Graham L. Radford-Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 15% |
Psychology | 5 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,594,029
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,107
of 8,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,291
of 330,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#67
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.