You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Eye movement impairments in Parkinson's disease: possible role of extradopaminergic mechanisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neurology, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2377-12-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elmar H Pinkhardt, Reinhart Jürgens, Dorothée Lulé, Johanna Heimrath, Albert C Ludolph, Wolfgang Becker, Jan Kassubek |
| Abstract |
The basal ganglia (BG) are thought to play an important role in the control of eye movements. Accordingly, the broad variety of subtle oculomotor alterations that has been described in Parkinson's disease (PD) are generally attributed to the dysfunction of the BG dopaminergic system. However, the present study suggest that dopamine substitution is much less effective in improving oculomotor performance than it is in restoring skeletomotor abilities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 17% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 31 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 27% |
| Psychology | 19 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 44 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,754,673
of 24,273,038 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#889
of 2,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,899
of 158,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,273,038 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.