You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-13-51 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hopewell N Ntsinjana, Marina L Hughes, Andrew M Taylor |
| Abstract |
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has expanded its role in the diagnosis and management of congenital heart disease (CHD) and acquired heart disease in pediatric patients. Ongoing technological advancements in both data acquisition and data presentation have enabled CMR to be integrated into clinical practice with increasing understanding of the advantages and limitations of the technique by pediatric cardiologists and congenital heart surgeons. Importantly, the combination of exquisite 3D anatomy with physiological data enables CMR to provide a unique perspective for the management of many patients with CHD. Imaging small children with CHD is challenging, and in this article we will review the technical adjustments, imaging protocols and application of CMR in the pediatric population. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 49 | 26% |
| Unknown | 38 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 50% |
| Engineering | 17 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2017.
All research outputs
#8,436,572
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#678
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,988
of 142,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them